Groups, institutions, discourses, cults, lifestyles, aesthetics, ideologies: Systems of Meaning
For me, there is no opposition between myth and science. Science originates in belief. What's more, mythological foundations have very often been used to elaborate theories that go on to be scientifically verified later. Belief is often at the origin of intuition that then becomes a physical or scientific law, so for me there isn't really an opposition between the two.
A community of practice is an intrinsic condition for the existence of knowledge, not least because it provides the interpretive support necessary for making sense of its heritage. Thus, participation in the cultural practice in which any knowledge exists is an epistemological principle of learning. The social structure of this practice, its power relations, and its conditions for legitimacy define possibilities for learning.
In summary, rather than learning by replicating the performance of others or by acquiring knowledge transmitted in instruction, we suggest that learning occurs through centripetal participation in the learning curriculum of the ambient community. Because the place of knowledge is within a community of practice, questions of learning must be addressed within the developmental cycles of that community, a recommendation which creates a diagnostic tool for distinguishing among communities of practice.